<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Povert &#187; Entertainment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.povert.com/category/media/entertainment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.povert.com</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Pronounced &#34;Pah-vert.&#34;  You povert.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:18:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UNO Strategy, Part 1: Wild Draw Four</title>
		<link>http://www.povert.com/2008/08/20/uno-strategy-part-1-wild-draw-four/</link>
		<comments>http://www.povert.com/2008/08/20/uno-strategy-part-1-wild-draw-four/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arcade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wd4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wild draw four]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.povert.com/?p=785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I&#8217;m a nerd. Shut up. I&#8217;ll come right out with it: I&#8217;ve become obsessed with UNO on Xbox Live Arcade. I hadn&#8217;t played UNO in a long time. It&#8217;s an interesting game. Some poker skills actually transfer over nicely. However, UNO is insanely random. Even more so than poker, someone who is &#8220;good&#8221; can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;m a nerd.  Shut up.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll come right out with it: I&#8217;ve become obsessed with UNO on Xbox Live Arcade.  I hadn&#8217;t played UNO in a long time.  It&#8217;s an interesting game.  Some poker skills actually transfer over nicely.</p>
<p>However, UNO is insanely random.  Even more so than poker, someone who is &#8220;good&#8221; can often be beaten by someone who has almost no clue what they&#8217;re doing.  That said, one should be able to increase their chances of winning any given four-player game to over 25%.</p>
<p>I should also point out that the games are a lot more fun once you&#8217;ve played a while and boosted your &#8220;TrueSkill&#8221; up into the 20s.  Up until that point you run into a lot of, erm, morons.  You&#8217;ll still run into morons, but at least these morons will typically stick through an entire match.</p>
<p>I titled this post &#8220;Part 1&#8243; because I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll have more to say; not because I have some grand plan here.  In this one, I&#8217;m going to concentrate on Wild Draw Four.  This is some pretty common-sense stuff, but I wanted to write it all down.  These are really just scattered notes.</p>
<p>Wild Draw Four is a pretty mean card.  It forces the next player to draw four cards and they miss their turn.  You&#8217;re only supposed to play it when you don&#8217;t have any card of the color that needs to be played.  Note that I said <strong>color</strong>.  If a green 4 is on the table and all you&#8217;ve got is a WD4 and a red 4, you can play the WD4 and win a challenge.</p>
<p>Anyway, if the victim challenges your WD4 and it turns out you were bluffing, <em>you</em> have to draw four cards and the victim doesn&#8217;t lose their turn.  If you weren&#8217;t bluffing, they have to draw 6 cards instead of 4.</p>
<p>How can you tell if someone may be bluffing?  It really depends, but generally, if they have a ton of cards in their hand and they play a WD4, they are likely bluffing.  If they only have 4 or 5, they&#8217;re probably not.  It&#8217;s also somewhat more likely that they&#8217;re bluffing it they&#8217;re playing it at a particularly convenient time, when you have UNO, for example.  Careful with that one, though.</p>
<p>And if a player has 2 cards and plays a WD4, changing the color and leaving them with 1 card &#8212; don&#8217;t challenge it.  I have no idea why people challenge in situations like that.  They&#8217;re almost never bluffing, and have very little incentive to.  The only time I can think of that this would make sense is if you played a wild card and called UNO, then it went around to the player who proceeds you without changing color, and that player has only a numbered card of that color and a WD4.  In that or similar situations, it really would make sense for them to bluff &#8212; in fact, it&#8217;s the only reasonable thing to do.</p>
<p>But if you have a handful of cards and someone with 2 cards plays WD4 on you, they&#8217;re probably not bluffing.  The only motivation they&#8217;d have to bluff is if they think they&#8217;re going out very soon and they want to fatten up other players&#8217; hands.  But if they&#8217;re close to winning, they&#8217;ll likely have few cards, which makes it less reasonable for them to bluff.</p>
<p>You won&#8217;t see this often in the 20+ TrueSkill range, but it does happen &#8212; The current color is (for example) red, and someone with a lot of cards plays a WD4 and chooses&#8230; red.  I&#8217;ve seen this.  Someone tried it on me.  Of course I challenged it and won.  If the current color is red and they play a WD4 and change it to red, that implies that they have red, and can thus be challenged.  A few games later I saw someone do this to someone else and the other player didn&#8217;t challenge.  I&#8217;m not sure why.  Perhaps they assumed that the guy who played the WD4 was insane.  At that point, even if the player is insane, you&#8217;re really better off challenging it.</p>
<p>As far as I can tell, most players don&#8217;t bluff with WD4 most of the time.  The vast majority of challenges I see are lost.  I think that most players like to hold onto WD4 for an appropriate time or something.</p>
<p>When should you bluff?  WD4 is worth 50 points if it&#8217;s in your hand for another player when they go out.  Sometimes you have to bluff, especially if you&#8217;re sure you&#8217;re about to lose.  It doesn&#8217;t matter if they challenge you and win, since there&#8217;s a decent chance that the four cards you&#8217;d have to draw won&#8217;t be more than 50.  You could draw three Reverses and you&#8217;re screwed, but hey.  And if the player had UNO and didn&#8217;t challenge, then you might be ok for a while longer.</p>
<p>Finally, sometimes you can catch someone bluffing when they appear to being playing WD4 out of anger.  If they recently were forced to draw a lot of cards and now have the chance to pay someone back, they&#8217;ll sometimes bluff a WD4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.povert.com/2008/08/20/uno-strategy-part-1-wild-draw-four/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wavebird</title>
		<link>http://www.povert.com/2007/08/27/wavebird/</link>
		<comments>http://www.povert.com/2007/08/27/wavebird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.povert.com/2007/08/27/wavebird/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kelly and I stumbled across a Wavebird the other day. A Wavebird is a wireless gamecube controller. You can play gamecube games on a wii, but it&#8217;s kind of a drag to use wired controllers. Buying a new one can be expensive. But we found one at an FYE in the Burnsville mall. It was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelly and I stumbled across a Wavebird the other day.</p>
<p>A Wavebird is a wireless gamecube controller.  You can play gamecube games on a wii, but it&#8217;s kind of a drag to use wired controllers.  Buying a new one <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00005BOSF/ref=dp_olp_2/002-8849990-2844848">can be expensive</a>.</p>
<p>But we found one at an FYE in the Burnsville mall.  It was kind of in a weird corner.  $30.</p>
<p>Score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.povert.com/2007/08/27/wavebird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sopranos, a week later</title>
		<link>http://www.povert.com/2007/06/18/sopranos-a-week-later/</link>
		<comments>http://www.povert.com/2007/06/18/sopranos-a-week-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.povert.com/2007/06/18/sopranos-a-week-later/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so my dad hated the finale. I still like it, though I still haven&#8217;t entirely settled on what happened. But I&#8217;m pretty sure. In a few weeks I&#8217;m gonna re-watch the last season (both parts). I&#8217;m not going to post an interpretation or anything &#8212; thousands of other fans are doing that already, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so <a href="http://www.povert.com/2007/06/11/sopranos/#comment-9937">my dad hated the finale</a>.</p>
<p>I still like it, though I still haven&#8217;t entirely settled on what happened.  But I&#8217;m pretty sure.</p>
<p>In a few weeks I&#8217;m gonna re-watch the last season (both parts).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to post an interpretation or anything &#8212; thousands of other fans are doing that already, and I don&#8217;t have any insight that others don&#8217;t have.  But here&#8217;s something kind of funny.  Early on in the finale, for some reason, I started looking for imagery resembling &#8220;The Last Supper&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t remember exactly why, but I think it was right after Bobby&#8217;s funeral, when everyone was grubbing that I started looking for it.  Which is funny, because this image completely sailed past me until someone pointed it out elsewhere:</p>
<p><img src='http://www.povert.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/lastsupper.jpg' alt='Tony Soprano’s Last Supper' /></p>
<p>It was right there at the end, but in all the excitement, I completely missed it.</p>
<p>That was a weird moment anyway.  Tony walks into the diner and looks for a place to sit.  Then it cuts directly to this shot.  It&#8217;s not exactly a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jump_cut">jump cut</a>, but it is weird.  They were trying to call attention to this shot.</p>
<p>Another funny moment, which was likely identical to what happened in many people&#8217;s living rooms: When Phil said, &#8220;Say bye-bye to grandpa!&#8221; we all cracked up &#8212; several of us said, &#8220;Bye-bye Phil!&#8221; enthusiastically.  Least surprising death ever.  But very entertaining.</p>
<p>Like I said, I liked the entire finale, including the ending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.povert.com/2007/06/18/sopranos-a-week-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sopranos</title>
		<link>http://www.povert.com/2007/06/11/sopranos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.povert.com/2007/06/11/sopranos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.povert.com/2007/06/11/sopranos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No spoilers here. I liked it. Yup, that&#8217;s all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No spoilers here.</p>
<p>I liked it.</p>
<p>Yup, that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.povert.com/2007/06/11/sopranos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DRM-free tracks from iTMS</title>
		<link>http://www.povert.com/2007/04/02/drm-free-tracks-from-itms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.povert.com/2007/04/02/drm-free-tracks-from-itms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech & Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.povert.com/2007/04/02/drm-free-tracks-from-itms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought it was a cruel April Fool&#8217;s Joke when I first saw it, but it looks to be true &#8212; starting next month Apple will be offering DRM-free tracks from EMI at double the bit rate. Single tracks will cost $1.29 (as opposed to $0.99) and people can upgrade previous purchases for $0.30 per [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was a cruel April Fool&#8217;s Joke when I first saw it, but it looks to be true &#8212; starting next month <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/04/02itunes.html">Apple will be offering DRM-free tracks from EMI at double the bit rate</a>.  Single tracks will cost $1.29 (as opposed to $0.99) and people can upgrade previous purchases for $0.30 per track.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.emigroup.com/Press/2007/press18.htm">EMI&#8217;s press release</a>: &#8220;Complete albums from EMI Music artists purchased on the iTunes Store will automatically be sold at the higher sound quality and DRM-free, with no change in the price.&#8221;</p>
<p>This makes me happy.  DRM is annoying.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a Coldplay album or two that I will upgrade, along with a few scattered songs from other EMI artists.</p>
<p>I wonder how this will interact with the new <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/03/29itunes.html">Complete My Album</a> thing &#8212; will the tracks you download to complete the album be DRM-free and 256 kbps?  If so, if the previously purchased tracks had DRM and were 128 kbps, will they be replaced?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.povert.com/2007/04/02/drm-free-tracks-from-itms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weird Al</title>
		<link>http://www.povert.com/2006/08/23/weird-al/</link>
		<comments>http://www.povert.com/2006/08/23/weird-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.povert.com/2006/08/23/weird-al/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t downloaded Don&#8217;t Download This Song by Weird Al, do yourself a favor and get it. What I like most about this is that my memory of Weird Al is that he just did silly stuff. I know I had &#8220;Fat&#8221; when I was a kid. And yeah, this song is kind of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t downloaded <a href="http://www.dontdownloadthissong.com/tracks/DDTS.mp3">Don&#8217;t Download This Song</a> by Weird Al, do yourself a favor and get it.</p>
<p>What I like most about this is that my memory of Weird Al is that he just did silly stuff.  I know I had &#8220;Fat&#8221; when I was a kid.  And yeah, this song is kind of silly, but it&#8217;s not <i>that</i> silly.  I mean, he isn&#8217;t joking when he talks about grandmas and 7 year old girls getting sued by the RIAA.</p>
<p>My point is that this is a great &#8220;Fuck You&#8221; to the RIAA, and I like it.</p>
<p>Also, the &#8220;We are the World&#8221; thing kills me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.povert.com/2006/08/23/weird-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Pryor</title>
		<link>http://www.povert.com/2005/12/10/richard-pryor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.povert.com/2005/12/10/richard-pryor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.povert.com/2005/12/10/richard-pryor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Pryor has died.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4517714.stm">Richard Pryor has died.</a> <img src='http://www.povert.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.povert.com/2005/12/10/richard-pryor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Colbert Report</title>
		<link>http://www.povert.com/2005/05/04/the-colbert-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.povert.com/2005/05/04/the-colbert-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.povert.com/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Colbert is going to do a spinoff of The Daily Show. The Colbert Report. It&#8217;s gonna make fun of all those personality shows on cable news. You know, Hannity, etc. Awesome. And check this quote: &#8220;We&#8217;re going to deal with truth on my program,&#8221; Mr. Colbert said. &#8220;We&#8217;re going to catch the world in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Colbert is going to do a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/04/arts/television/04come.html?8hpib">spinoff</a> of The Daily Show.  The Colbert Report.  It&#8217;s gonna make fun of all those personality shows on cable news.  You know, Hannity, etc.</p>
<p>Awesome.  And check this quote:<br />
<blockquote>&#8220;We&#8217;re going to deal with truth on my program,&#8221; Mr. Colbert said. &#8220;We&#8217;re going to catch the world in the headlights of my justice.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.povert.com/2005/05/04/the-colbert-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music Videos?</title>
		<link>http://www.povert.com/2005/02/03/music-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.povert.com/2005/02/03/music-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.povert.com/?p=237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The analysis, contained in a report titled &#8220;MTV Smut Peddlers,&#8221; spotted 13 sexual scenes per hour in MTV&#8217;s reality series, as well as 32 instance of foul language per hour in its music videos.[link] Wait wait wait. They show music videos? The last time I saw a music video on MTV was in early 2003 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The analysis, contained in a report titled &#8220;MTV Smut Peddlers,&#8221; spotted 13 sexual scenes per hour in MTV&#8217;s reality series, as well as 32 instance of foul language per hour in its music videos.<a href="http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=televisionNews&#038;storyID=7509145">[link]</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Wait wait wait.  They show music videos?  The last time I saw a music video on MTV was in early 2003 at like 2AM.  I think it was a Jennifer Lopez video.  I&#8217;m sure there were logos popping up, covering 70% of the screen, and a text crawl with flashing letters updating the viewer with important entertainment news, but there was definitely a video in there&#8230; somewhere.</p>
<p>Not like I check up on MTV much.  For all I know they might be playing videos again.</p>
<p>As for the rest of the article, I can tell that it&#8217;s a totally objective report just from the title: MTV Smut Peddlers.  &lt;/sarcasm&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.povert.com/2005/02/03/music-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This American Life</title>
		<link>http://www.povert.com/2005/01/05/this-american-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.povert.com/2005/01/05/this-american-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.povert.com/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve become obsessed with &#8220;This American Life.&#8221; I was introduced to this show by a coworker. You know how people tell you that you just have to listen or watch this or that? And how you normally ignore that? Well, I listened to an episode a couple months ago. It wasn&#8217;t necessarily by my coworker&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve become obsessed with &#8220;This American Life.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was introduced to this show by a coworker.  You know how people tell you that you just have to listen or watch this or that?  And how you normally ignore that?</p>
<p>Well, I listened to an episode a couple months ago.  It wasn&#8217;t necessarily by my coworker&#8217;s promptings.  But somehow, in the last couple weeks, I&#8217;ve become hooked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.povert.com/2005/01/05/this-american-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
